17 comp sci profs file brief in Grokster case

Via Freedom to Tinker and Boing Boing, 17 comp sci profs have file an amicus brief (PDF) in the Supreme Court Grokster, a case that will determine whether p2p tech is illegal and if tech companies can be liable for copyright infringement using their products. I’ve only read what F2T and BB posted of it, but I reproduce it here for convenience. This except provides a fantastic compact argument for why p2p is vital to the overall growth of networked tools:

Amici write to call to the Court’s attention several computer science issues raised by Petitioners [i.e., the movie and music companies] and amici who filed concurrent with Petitioners, and to correct certain of their technical assertions. First, the United States’ description of the Internet’s design is wrong. P2P networks are not new developments in network design, but rather the design on which the Internet itself is based. Second, a P2P network design, where the work is done by the end user’s machine, is preferable to a design which forces work (such as filtering) to be done within the network, because a P2P design can be robust and efficient. Third, because of the difficulty in designing distributed networks, advances in P2P network design — including BitTorrent and Respondents’ [i.e., Grokster’s and Streamcast’s] software — are crucial to developing the next generation of P2P networks, such as the NSF-funded IRIS Project. Fourth, Petitioners’ assertion that filtering software will work fails to consider that users cannot be forced to install the filter, filtering software is unproven or that users will find other ways to defeat the filter. Finally, while Petitioners state that infringers’ anonymity makes legal action difficult, the truth is that Petitioners can obtain IP addresses easily and have filed lawsuits against more than 8,400 alleged infringers. Because Petitioners seek a remedy that will hobble advances in technology, while they have other means to obtain relief for infringement, amici ask the Court to affirm the judgment below.

One Response to “17 comp sci profs file brief in Grokster case”

  1. Bibliotheke » 22 media studies scholars file brief in Grokster Says:

    […] EKE 3/2/2005 22 media studies scholars file brief in Grokster Similar to the brief mentioned yesterday from 17 comp sci profs, 22 me […]